removed spow(x, 0); calls, I did them for consistency's sake, but it should be rather obvious how the scaling works anyways
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									85c9ebf2fc
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						2cd1609770
					
				
							
								
								
									
										6
									
								
								layout.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										6
									
								
								layout.c
									
									
									
									
									
								
							| @ -43,7 +43,7 @@ tile(void) { | ||||
| 				sum += spow(vratio, i); | ||||
| 			mscale = wah / sum; | ||||
| 			if(vratio >= 1) | ||||
| 				mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, 0)); | ||||
| 				mmaxtile = bh > mscale; | ||||
| 			else | ||||
| 				mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, n - 1)); | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| @ -55,8 +55,8 @@ tile(void) { | ||||
| 				sum += spow(vratio, i); | ||||
| 			sscale = wah / sum; | ||||
| 			if(vratio >= 1) { | ||||
| 				mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, 0)); | ||||
| 				smaxtile = bh > (sscale * spow(vratio, 0)); | ||||
| 				mmaxtile = bh > mscale; | ||||
| 				smaxtile = bh > sscale; | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 			else { | ||||
| 				mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, nmaster - 1)); | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	 Anselm R. Garbe
						Anselm R. Garbe